Showing posts with label Utah Education Vouchers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Utah Education Vouchers. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Give Glen His Voucher!

By One Utah's Glenden Brown

I have a cousin who has 8 children, all 8 of whom attended public school. By contrast, I don’t have 8 children.

None of the 8 children I don’t have attended public school. According to Parent’s for Choice in education, every year one of the 8 children I don’t have wasn’t in public school, I saved the school system $5500. By my math, that means I’ve saved State of Utah $572,000. In light of that almost $600,000 in savings, I think I should qualify for $3000 per child voucher to cover the expense of not sending the 8 kids I don’t have to public school. The 8 kids I don’t have have collectively not attended 104 years of public school. A $3000 per child voucher per year comes up to $312,000. To whom should I submit my invoice for my vouchers? Please send my “vouchers” in the form of unmarked, $1o0 bills.

Come to think of it, I have a neighbor with 12 kids all of whom attended public school. I don’t have 12 children either. So maybe, I didn’t send 12 children to the public schools, and should receive vouchers to cover the cost of not sending 12 kids to the public schools. Heck, I could use $468,000 of tax payers money to cover the expense of not sending 12 kids to public school.

You know, actually, my parents know a family with 14 children and I don’t have 14 children . . .


Hat tip: BoB AaGarD

Monday, May 21, 2007

USDP: Sutherland's Mero uses the worst of all possible analogies

In today's Salt Lake Tribune, the Sutherland Institute's Paul T. Mero made a clumsy and ill conceived (not to mention just plain wrong headed and insensitive) effort to compare the current arguments advanced in opposition to vouchers with the arguments used to support slavery through the mid 19th century. At least he had the good sense to begin by stating "Certainly the common experience in our public schools in Utah is far removed from anything comparable to the inhumane experiences of slavery." Unfortunately, he didn't let the degree of public education's removal from the slavery experience stop him.

Continue reading from the Utah Democratic Party Blog here.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Voucher conclusions after a conversation with a "fed-up" Utah Republican

Today I met with a small business owner who told me he has voted as a Republican most of his life, that is until this last election cycle where he voted a straight Democratic ticket.

His conversation was not emotional, or angry, but he was very clear that he was "fed-up" with the Republican Party both nationally and locally.

When I told him that I was the vice chair of the Democratic Party he asked, "are you going to finally get rid of Greg Curtis?" I assured him that the Utah Democratic Party had ever intention in doing so.

His big issue?

How could the legislature and Governor Huntsman go forward with the Sandy/ReAL stadium deal after Mayor Corroon's wise and educated decision that was based on what was best for the common good?

When I said, "it really didn't matter if the stadium is a success or not, all that really mattered was those who would profit from building the stadium".

He agreed.

When I asked him about his opinion on school vouchers he explained that he had been a member of corporate America for many years and that he and his family had a great experience in the Pittsburgh Public School System.

"It changed my daughter's life", he explained. "When we returned to Utah my daughter asked if she could go back and finish school in Pittsburgh."

He then explained his belief that the citizens of Pittsburgh have built a system that leaves their students with three problems; whether to go to Harvard, Yale, or Columbia.

As we continued our conversation I explained two of my issues with vouchers. I told him how ironic it is that our Republican-dominated legislature has deliberately put a strangle-hold on public education funding over the last 20 years, and how they are unwilling to take any responsibility for their actions.

I also explained my belief that there is no room for vouchers until we build a public school system that allows every child the opportunity to have the very best educational expedience without their parents having to pay for a private education. To me, a private education is a choice, and that choice has a cost. That is why it is called "Private".

Private: 1 a : intended for or restricted to the use of a particular person, group, or class.

As we continued to talk we both agreed that the most important factor in a child's education is the involvement of that child's parent(s). Michelle and I could not be more pleased with Abby's public school teacher and experience. We know her teacher is doing a great job because we are involved with Abby's class, and because school doesn't end for Abby when when the bell rings.

Michelle reads to our children every night and we allow our children the opportunities to explore and discover their talents, as best we can.

Which brings me to this conclusion: Almost every issue that is used in politics to divide us are issues that will never be solved by the government as long as we look at the government as something evil, or incapable, or "failing". We are the government, and we are not only responsible for our own children, but for every child, whether they share our DNA or not.

I believe in the public school system, and I believe that it is privilege when my tax dollars not only help my children receive an education, but that my tax dollars will also help your children receive an education.

If Michelle and I decide for some reason that we do want to place our children in a private school then I still want my tax dollars to fund the public education system that educated my grandparents, my parents and me, even after my children are raised, and when we no longer have children attending school. You see, for me it is very simple; we all profit from the education provided by public schools.

The choice is there; it always has been there. Vouchers have never been about choice, or the lack of it.

If we really want to build our economy, if we truly want to reach for the stars, then let's build a public education system that is second to none anywhere on this planet. When we do so, we can truly say that we are each others keeper, and that we have achieved something truly great.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Voucher Truths II

The Method:
"We see vouchers as a major step toward the complete privatization of schooling. In fact, after careful study, we have come to the conclusion that they are the only way to dismantle the current socialist regime."


Joseph Bast
President, Heartland Institute
(From an essay published by the Cato Institute)

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Voucher Truths

The Goal:

"I proclaim publicly that I favor ending government involvement in education."


Paul Mero

President, Sutherland Institute

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Utah Democratic Party e-mail from 03/06/07 that PCE included in their "liberal" e-mail blast

Public Education advocates launch voucher referendum

During the 2007 legislative session, the Utah legislature passed a bill that allows your tax dollars to be spent to subsidize private schools in Utah through so-called “vouchers” ranging from $300 to as much as $3,000.

These vouchers would be a poor way to advance education in Utah under the best of circumstances, but with Utah ranking dead last in the nation in per pupil spending, vouchers are especially ill advised. Even with this year’s record increase in education spending, Utah has a long ways to go to catch up.

Every Democrat serving in the Utah legislature opposed this year’s voucher legislation. We encourage every Utah Democrat to get involved in the effort by Utahns for Public Schools to put the 2007 voucher legislation to a vote of the people. The group has until April 9th to gather the tens of thousands of signatures required to place vouchers on the ballot in 2008.

To learn more about the referendum drive email info@utahnsforpublicschools.org or click on the link provided below.

Notice the difference in the language used in our e-mail and Doug's e-mail:

"Republicans must not sign these petitions!"

"We encourage every Utah Democrat to get involved in the effort by Utahns for Public Schools..."

Saturday, February 03, 2007

Perhaps legislators have been cowed by Parents for Choice in Education.

By Joel Briscoe
Sen. Bramble is not telling the whole story when he stated that his interest in turning state and local school board elections into partisan contests (SB194) is to encourage the recruitment of more candidates and to create “more visible campaigns.” Deseret News, January 27, A-1.

He tipped his hand when he further stated that getting Parents for Choice and other pro-voucher groups more involved in school board races would be “a very positive outcome. That’s what we’re hoping for.”

Parents for Choice in Education was heavily involved in two of the four contested 2006 races for the state school board. Both of them were races against incumbents who are opposed to vouchers and tuition tax credits.

What is scary about Richard Moss’s defeat of Ed Dalton was the funding of Moss’s campaign. Moss spent over $38,000 and outspent Dalton over 26-to-1. More troubling is that fact that 87% of Moss’s funds came from Parents for Choice, almost $34,000.

Only two groups contributed to Moss’s campaign: Parents for Choice and Moss himself. Was this a broad based campaign for a seat on the State School Board?

Parents for Choice also took on the State School Board President, Kim Burningham. His opponent, Christopher Barden, is a wealthy individual who put over $10,000 of his own money into his campaign. Nonetheless, Parents for Choice donated over $36,000 to Barden, whose total campaign spent almost $62,000.

Barden’s campaign was very visible. In a first for a school board race Barden ran ads on TV. All of Parents for Choice’s money was given to Barden in the last ten days of the race, fueling a fury of mailings and ads unprecedented in a campaign for the State School Board. On September 15, Barden reported receiving $2,700 in donations and spending $7,500. Perhaps this is the type of “visible” campaign with involvement by tuition-tax credit supporters that Bramble wants to see more of.

Together, Moss and Barden raised over $100,000, and almost $70,000 of that tremendous sum came from Parents for Choice in Education. Would someone in the Legislature please take up the cause of campaign finance reform in Utah, and reign in these obscene amounts of money? Perhaps legislators have been cowed by Parents for Choice in Education.

Joel Briscoe

Friday, February 02, 2007

HB 148 (Education Vouchers) passes the Utah House by one vote

Sad news for Utah Taxpayers: The Voucher Bill just passed the House by one vote.

Below is how our Leg. Reps voted:

SEQUENCE #129 STATE OF UTAH HB 148
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY Urquhart, S.
2007 General Session of the 57th Legislature
VOTE TABULATION

Education Vouchers

FEBRUARY 2, 2007 Curtis
12:07:49 PM Education Vouchers SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

YEAS - 38
Andersen
Fowlke
Kiser
Sumsion
Barrus
Frank
Last
Tilton
Buxton
Froerer
Lockhart
Urquhart
Clark, D.
Garn
Morley
Walker
Clark, S.
Gibson
Wheeler
Neuenschwander

Daw
Grover
Newbold
Wimmer
Dee
Harper
Noel
Wyatt
Donnelson
Herrod
Oda
Curtis
Dougall
Hughes
Painter
Draxler
Hutchings, E.
Sandstrom

NAYS - 37

Aagard
Dunnigan
Johnson
Ray
Allen, S.
Ferry
King
Riesen
Becker
Fisher, Janice
Litvack
Seelig
Bigelow
Fisher, Julie
Mascaro
Shurtliff
Bird
Gowans
Mathis
Snow, G.
Biskupski
Hansen
McGee
Wheatley
Bowman
Hemingway
McIff
Wiley

Brown
Hendrickson
Menlove
Cosgrove
Holdaway
Morgan
Duckworth
Hunsaker
Moss

ABSENT OR NOT VOTING - 0