Showing posts with label Immigration reform. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigration reform. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2008

A Dream Deferred




From adreamdeferred.org:
Dear Hillary Clinton, John McCain, and Barack Obama,

All three of you co-sponsored the federal DREAM Act, yet it has never been made law. One of you will be President next year, so no more excuses! You must secure America's future by committing now to enact the federal DREAM Act in your first 100 days in office.

Friday, February 01, 2008

The Daily Herald get's it


IN OUR VIEW:
Don't overreact on immigration
Contributed by Daily Herald
Thursday, 31 January 2008

Two proposed Utah laws highlight -- through their flaws, unfortunately -- key ingredients in any legislation on immigration: practicality and fairness.

With many Americans simmering over a wave of illegal immigration, state lawmakers are feeling popular pressure to take action. Estimates put the number of illegal aliens somewhere between 7 million and 20 million.

New laws addressing illegal immigrants are clearly needed, but they need to be carefully conceived.

A proposal (HB 239) by Rep. Glenn Donnelson, R-North Ogden, would revoke "driver privilege cards" that are issued to about 35,000 drivers without Social Security numbers -- mostly illegal immigrants. Donnelson said it aims to prevent people from misusing the cards for identification purposes, as in buying alcohol.

The main purpose of the cards is to provide a way for illegal aliens to take the state driving test and get auto insurance. A new study suggests the program is working. The Legislative Auditor General found that 76 percent of the card holders insure their vehicles, just slightly less than the 82 percent of licensed drivers who do so.

What would revocation of the cards do? Apparently take insurance away from at least 20,000 drivers, and keep thousands from studying the rules of the road to pass the license exam. Taking away driver privilege cards would only make it more likely that your car would be in a crash with that of an undocumented driver, and that he or she would not have insurance. That's far from a useful step.

Another bill (HB 241) is patently unfair. Also sponsored by Donnelson, this bill would prohibit undocumented students from getting in-state tuition at Utah colleges. A 2002 state law gives such students the break if they attended a Utah high school for three years and graduated.

Efforts to change this law are misguided and harsh. Most of these students obviously had no say in coming to this country. We shouldn't hurt kids to get at their parents. It's wrong to punish them for studying diligently enough to be admitted to college and for desiring to make something of themselves. Passing this proposal would only result in more people working in lower-skilled jobs, rather than letting the economy make the best use of their talents.

We urge senators to put aside the bills cited above. One won't work, and the other stains Utah's honor.

Other aspects of illegal immigration have prompted other proposals. We are tempted to urge the Utah Senate to consider a resolution proposed by Sen. Howard Stephenson, R-Draper, asking that the state defer immigration legislation until Congress and the president approve a workable national policy. That sounds good, but we might be waiting a very long time. Congress doesn't seem to have the stomach for this.

Utah needs to do what little it can in the meantime. And on this score we urge that any action be broad-minded and fair. LDS and Catholic leaders have recently urged Utah lawmakers to be compassionate about immigrants. These insights are timely. Most immigrants are law-abiding people who come here to work to help their families and improve their lives. Punishments should be reserved for genuine criminals.

Clearly, Americans must accept some responsibility for allowing the immigration problem to develop. Imagine you owned a beautiful beach-front property. The law allows you to ban trespassers. But now and then a few people sneak onto the beach. You ignore them for awhile. Then you decide to pay some of them a few bucks to pick up litter, watch the kids and perform other chores. Say this goes on for two decades. Then one day you decide there are too many people on your beach. You call the police and ask them to arrest those people for trespassing.

Would that be fair? Of course not.

This is not to say we must despair of reinvigorating the law and controlling U.S. borders. But it does suggest that we should be smart about it. For example, it may not be necessary to build hundreds of miles of border fence. Physical barriers won't work, as pointed out in a prize-winning report by the Arizona Daily Star in Tucson.

So what will work? We return to the suggestion of a virtual fence in the form of severe punishments for employers -- severe enough to remove all temptation to provide jobs to illegals. Allowing for some sort of transition period, the future would look like this: No jobs; no illegal immigration; end of story. Such a virtual fence would be cheaper to build, more effective than other options, and both fair and humane. Everyone would know the rules and there's little room for gaming the system.

Respect for the rule of law is a fundamental American value. To flout this most basic principle shows a colossal disregard for what this country is all about. Those who do so don't deserve to be here. But in addressing the problem of illegal immigration we should be careful to retain the moral high ground.

Drivers willing to buy insurance should not be prevented from buying it. Aspiring college students should not be treated the same way as day laborers who sneaked into the country last month.

When it comes to immigration, there is no reason for vindictiveness, only clarity.

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Immigration

This afternoon Sean Hannity said that immigration was the number one issue for conservatives in America.

As I listened to Hannity and his listeners go on and on about securing the boarders I thought, "what are the daily problems I face because of illegal immigration?"

Hmmmm.

I then thought, "what does affect my family on a daily basis?"

My first thought was, "unaffordable healthcare."

Sometimes in life we have to sacrifice, and that's okay because I understand that my personal sacrifice allows me the opportunity to make sure that my wife and kids are insured.

I really began to understand how much my sacrifice was worth over the last two weeks while I have been trying to fight off pneumonia, but no worries; at least I know that my sacrifice might even go beyond aiding my own family. Since I'm not insured and cannot make a claim, IHC has more money for their corporate officers to purchase their second and third homes. Knowing this helps to get me through my illness and the stress caused by the realization that I might have even more severe undiscovered health issues.

High gas prices have also been problematic for our young, middle-class family, but we cut back where we can and make due, and we feel good about it, because we know that our soldiers in Iraq are making even a bigger sacrifice as the fight and die for our freedom while oil corporations and Halliburton announce record profits.

In fact, our family is planning to cut back even more because I heard on the Doug Wright Show that the state tax on gas needs to be raised because the state is losing money because of people like me who are cutting back on buying gas.

With all that thinking I started to get a headache, but even with the pounding in my head I was able to think this one last one last thought,

"Damn those illegals anyway!"

Friday, June 01, 2007

AMNESTY


This post is dedicated to all my wall building, border securing, Sean Hannity following friends who claim to be Ronald Reagan conservatives

Thursday, March 29, 2007

NEW PARADIGM FOR IMMIGRATION REFORM

By Steve Olsen
For some reason, after all the noise during the 2006 election year, the immigration debate has taken a vacation. This could be a good thing; without the political posturing, the nation’s leaders might be able to accomplish something. But we need some sort of new vision; a major paradigm shift to break the logjam.

I was presented such a vision from an unlikely source. I learned about it from a friend who also happens to be my church file leader. His father, Alton Griffin of Farr West, a World War II veteran and a respected businessman and church leader, received this epiphany last year, and with the help of his sons, had refined it into a position document. I received a copy of this document recently and was able to study it.

Before we go into that, we need to confront some honest facts and dispel some myths about immigration in America:

Myth #1: We can’t solve America’s immigration problems until we first secure our borders.

Fact: Here’s the little secret everyone in Washington understands but won’t admit: We will never be able to completely secure America’s borders. The “lower 48” has over 5000 miles of land borders and over 5000 miles of ocean coastline. It is a physical impossibility to fence or patrol that much border. Whether we’re talking about keeping immigrants or terrorists out, it simply can’t be done. Even the fence that Congress finally came up with after a year of wrangling only spans 1/3 of the Mexican land border; Canada’s border is left open. Another fact: almost half of the illegal immigrants in America didn’t sneak in over the Mexican border; they came here legally and overstayed their visas – which is how the 9/11 terrorists got in.

Myth #2: Illegal immigrants are stealing American jobs.

Fact: The national unemployment rate is 4.5%. In Utah, it’s 2.6%. Just who, exactly, had their job stolen by an illegal immigrant? There is currently a shortage of workers in Utah. Economists and business leaders will tell you that Utah’s economy would have tanked unless the illegal immigrant workforce had been there to take up the slack. If it were possible to immediately remove the entire illegal workforce in Utah, within a week most of the fresh produce, meat and dairy products would be gone from the grocer’s shelves. Construction would come to a halt. Most hotels and restaurants would shut down. I could go on.

Myth #3: Illegal immigrants and those that employ them are lawbreakers and must be punished.

Fact: Technically, yes. The same way that you and I break the law when we drive eight miles an hour over the speed limit. Why do we do that? Because everyone knows the government does not enforce the law unless you’re 10 mph over the limit. When the law is so messed up it is unenforceable, the lawgivers must be blamed rather than the lawbreakers.

I spoke with a dairy farmer last year who tried to do things the legal way. He applied to the government to get legal immigrants to work on his farm. After a year of red tape and getting absolutely nowhere with the government, he faced a decision: Do I continue to obey the law, or do I allow my farm to fail? Shame on Congress for forcing a good man to make that decision. There are a few bad apples among employers, like every other group, but most are good citizens providing jobs and services to our community and want to follow the law. Why do they deserve to be punished for a system that is broken?

Here are a few cold, hard facts: The only way to solve the illegal immigrant problem is to find a workable method to regulate how they are employed. There are anywhere from 10-20 million undocumented workers in America today, and despite the bluster from certain factions, the nation does not have the ability to find and round up all those people onto cattle cars and ship them home. (Only about 55% of illegal immigrants are from Mexico, so we can’t exactly dump them all off in Tijuana.) Thankfully, nor do we possess the Nazi-like cruelty it would require to commit such an act. It would cause untold disruption to our economy, not to mention the lives of millions of innocent children. Despite the bluster, the vast majority of these people will have to be turned into registered temporary guest workers to get a handle on the current situation. Any solution that doesn’t deal with the problem without ripping apart millions of families – which Americans will never tolerate – and damaging our economy is based on fantasy.

Now, back to the epiphany from my good friend Alton. During World War II, the federal government delegated the task of manning our armed forces to state and local draft boards, which had a great deal of latitude in performing their tasks. Using World War II draft boards as a pattern, Alton's idea is to create State and County Immigration Boards to find and register temporary guest workers and those that employ them, as directed by the governor and the legislature. This would bring the administration of worker registration to the “grass roots” level – where the employers are and where the immigrants live and work. These county boards would issue high-tech ID cards, administer local databases of workers and employers, and verify compliance with state mandates. Compliance and cooperation would be much greater compared with working through a federal bureaucracy taking orders from Washington.

With a high compliance rate created by the trust and local knowledge of these county boards, immigrants could be identified and proper taxes could be collected to support the social services required by these temporary guest workers. Those with no jobs would not be issued ID cards, and with high employer compliance stemming from local administration, those who have not been registered could not find work and would leave. Bringing honest families out in the open would also make it easier to identify criminal elements among the immigrants, allowing them to be arrested and deported.

The above is just a broad brush summary of the concept; there are obviously details to work out. These locally registered temporary guest workers would have no guarantees of permanent citizenship or residence; that would have to be earned, and it would be unfair to move them ahead of foreign citizens who have remained in their native countries while working for permanent visas. Given this, an honest appraisal of our current situation leads one to admit that it would be better for all concerned to bring these families out from the shadows.

For all of you who criticize undocumented workers as lawbreakers, I have a question. If you faced the choice of staying in the shadows or seeing your children starve, which would you choose? We will never find them all unless we create an environment where they will voluntarily come into the open. As long as these families are here, we need to bring them into the sunshine, make sure they are protected by our laws, and ensure they and their employers are paying their fair share in support of the community services they use.